Kathryn's Studio Blog Home About The Artist Contact Works

Home

Work

About the Artist

Resume

Contact the Artist

Links

Join Email List

Kathryn's Blog

Daily Painting Blog



Follow this Blog

Topical Index

Current


 Archives:May 2010
Mar 2010
Jan 2010
Dec 2009
Nov 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
July 2009
May 2009



« Wear the dang boots | Main | Winter solstice »
Reframing
by Kathryn Townsend on 11/1/2009 2:03:39 PM




"Storm Hell's Backbone", Oil, 9" x 9"

When I was living in Boston I went to Filenes and bought a winter coat.  I loved the coat—it was long and sleek, gray wool with two rows of buttons down the front—and it was warm.  When I got home, I modeled it for one of my housemates, who said it looked like a 1940’s army coat.  Then I hated the coat because that wasn’t the image I had of myself. This is called “reframing,” a psychological term used by the guys who developed neuro-linguistic programming.  But their objective is therapeutic—to turn bad experiences into good ones by creating a new context in which to view an experience.  Politicians use reframing for negative purposes—to turn good qualities of their opponents into loathsome ones.

The same thing happened when I took a group of paintings to be critiqued by an older experienced painter.  He dismissed some of the paintings I loved with contempt.  He loved some of the paintings I hated.  But the reframe only worked in turning good experiences into bad, not the other way around.  I can’t bring to life the paintings that he loved but that I hate—they will always seem dead to me, the past, not the future.  But some of the ones that I love, the ones that represent the future that I am still reasoning with, are more fragile, and it was pretty easy to end up feeling ashamed for my lack of skills and lapses in decision making.  The fact that they represented joyful steps in my progress didn’t enter into it—they were now dogs to be burned.

There is always a risk in asking for a critique.  There is the part that wants to know the honest truth--what the expert thinks--the part that knows a reality check is in order.  But the expert says, "do not, under any circumstances, paint for the market," so then I have to be careful not to take the expert's judgments as the word of god and fall into the very trap that he advises against.

The problem with outdoor painting, I write to him, is that there is a natural "high" from the experience and that feeling is transferred into the painting, whether or not the painting is any good on its own.  Painting outside has proven to me that at least a big measure of the joy and inspiration of painting comes because of the open air and the beauty of natural light.  So the big issue, the one I am always pondering, is how to protect the positive feelings that are the basis of motivation from the cold hard assessment of the end product.  

It is almost winter.  It rains a lot here.  I decide to clean my studio and confront my piles of never-to-be-framed paintings.  I get a newsletter from Rebecca Ross of the Composed Domain.  She says “clearing creates a resonance which allows disturbed energy to return to a state of balance.”  I remember the paintings that I had a friend take to the dump that ended up on his wall. I take the utility knife out of the drawer.




What Would You Like to Do Next?

Join Email List

Follow this Blog via RSS

Make a comment

Share this post via other Social Media (ie Digg, Delicious):





Post Details:

Permalink | 3 Comments

Technorati Tags:



sharon M. Curran
via kathryntownsend.com
Just what I needed to read this morning. I have the same problem, work on a piece till I am  so happy and hate to see it go, then I ask for an opinion, I get their weird comments that would change the whole painting to what they would like to see. I would like an honest critique that would tell me the mistakes that I have made and how to correct it. Instead I hear,, "Its not your best, or you should change the roof angle, I don't think the grass was that color," etc. etc. so their answers are confusing to me, I am asking about the structure, values, composition, interest.. and I hear language that tells me that its just a bad painting or requesting I change a spot that they would have done. I guess I need a very good class on how to critique my own or others paintings. Do you have any suggestions or know of a book that I could pick up ..

thank you for putting into words that the rest of us flounder with. Its all subjective, isn't it.

thanks sharon
Kathryn
via web
Hi Sharon,

Something I failed to mention in my blog is that I asked a very special artist to critique my work.  However painful the critique was in some of the detail, it was encouraging that many of the paintings that I thought were the strongest were still standing at the end of the critique and I am indebted to this artist for the time he took to look at a body of my work and the thought he put into it.

But the confusion you feel about critiques rings a bell with me--not all critiques are particularly helpful and some are so unhelpful they are downright maddening.  Its easy to blame the person giving the critique for this outcome, but its just as likely that we blame ourselves and call it our own failure, so I think you are right that it makes sense to seek a method for self-critique and not always rely on others to tell us what is good and what is bad.  We have to develop a sense of purpose in learning.

Yesterday, while cleaning out my studio, I came across the book, "Art and Fear," http://painting.about.com/od/productreviews/fr/Art_and_Fear.htm and it said perfectly what I was trying to say in my blog:  "To all viewers but yourself, what matters is the product: the finished artwork.  To you, and you alone, what matters is the process: the experience of shaping that artwork."  So the best critique will in some measure bridge the gap between these two things--it will take into account where I've been and where I am going and it will give me a measuring stick from one outside perspective--an anchor that says: "yes, I am right to go in this direction at this time and this is what I need to work on."  A good critique is a door rather than a wall, but I am the responsible party--I have to be ready to walk through that door.  And I have the right to say, "Look, I'm not getting that.  Can you please say more about that."

My friend, Barry Raybould, put together an online course that is based on specific principles such as the ones you mention.  Since the course teaches the concepts in a systematic way, it gives a basis for learning how to self-critique.  He’s also created a private online learning community for people studying the concepts and doing the exercises. I was surprised to see how much he's charging for it now, but its probably fair considering the cost of a 5-day workshop. Barry has pushed me to do painting exercises that I might not have done on my own.  You can check it out at:
http://www.virtualartacademy.com


Best of luck!

Kathryn PS--I really enjoyed seeing you on Whidby!
Jeanne Edwards
via kathryntownsend.com
Kathryn,
Your blog said everything that I seem to feel every time I ask someone to look at my work. So, yes, I do refer to Art and Fear on a regular basis and it does help. But it always amazes me that when I feel good about a piece - it is always the one that no one else likes.
When I look at your paintings I see such joy with your brushstrokes and use of color - especially your more recent ones.
Looking forward to San Miguel.









 

Artist websites by FineArtStudioOnline.com

© Kathryn Townsend 2009 All Rights Reserved - Email:kath.townsend@gmail.com